Home » Better Investor, Featured

Benjamin Graham Checklists and Formulas

August 13, 2009 12:49 pm by Dean Morel

Benjamin_GrahamI have a confession to make. I must be one of the few serious investors who never finished the Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. I didn’t enjoy reading what I recall was the second edition and decided I might enjoy the Jason Zweig revised edition more. So I returned the book to the library half read and put the Zweig edition on my Amazon wish-list. In my defence that was 2007 and at that time there was little prospect of scoping up the bargains preferred by Graham. For my sins against value investing I recently bought a copy of The Classic 1940 Second Edition of Security Analysis by Graham and Dodd. I’ll let you know if it is a classic when I’ve finished working my way through it.

I only mention this now as the other day a TMF poster asked about Ben Graham’s checklists and I tracked down the following for him at Capital Ideas Online.

In a great book Benjamin Graham on Investing: Enduring Lessons from the Father of Value Investing, the author, Janet Lowe, writes on Graham’s attributes for an undervalued stock.

  1. “An earnings-to-price yield (reverse of the P/E ratio) that is double the triple-A bond yield. If the triple-A bond yield is 8 percent, the required earnings yield then will be 16 percent.
  2. A price-to-earning ratio that is four-tenths of the highest average P/E ratio achieved by the stock in the most recent five years. (To get the average P/E ratio, an average stock price for a given year is divided by the earnings for that year.)
  3. A dividend yield of two-thirds the triple-A bond yield. Stocks paying no dividends or those that have no current profits from which to pay dividends are excluded.
  4. A stock price of two-thirds the tangible book value per share. This is calculated by adding up all the assets, excluding intangibles such as goodwill, patents, etc, subtracting all liabilities and dividing by the total number of shares.
  5. A stock price that is two-thirds of the “net current asset value” or the “net liquidation value.” The net quick liquidation value is current assets (those assets that are immediately convertible into cash, fixed assets omitted) less total debt. This, of course, was the foundation of Ben’s original theory.
  6. Total debt that is less than tangible book value.
  7. A current ratio of two or more. The current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities. This is an indication of the company’s liquidity, or its ability to pay its debt from its income.
  8. Total debt at or less than the net quick liquidation value.
  9. Earnings that have doubled in the most recent ten years.
  10. No more than two declines in earnings of 5 percent or more in the past ten years.”

I found those investing criteria interesting, but what tickled my fancy even more was a link provided by another poster. Benjamin Graham’s Lost Magic Formula In 1976? is a entertaining article on interviews of Graham late in his life. One of attributes I most admire about Graham is his open inquisitive mind, which I think GuruFocus illustrated in the following passage.

After 60 years of analyzing financial statements and managements, Graham said this about projecting earnings, evaluating market share, and analyzing individual companies:

“Those factors are significant in theory, but they turn out to be of little practical use in deciding what price to pay for particular stocks or when to sell them. My investigations have convinced me you can predetermine these logical “buy” and “sell” levels for a widely diversified portfolio without getting involved in weighing the fundamental factors affecting the prospects of specific companies or industries.”

This is not what you’d expect from the author of the bible of value investing and the original advocate of the Chartered Financial Analysts organization, renowned for their high analytical standards. Human nature would be to defend his 60 years of investment contributions which preached steadfast adherence to rigorous analysis. Instead, at 82 he was still open to new ideas while in search of the simplest method of selecting bargain stocks. His formula went through two iterations. He introduced the first formula at age 79 and concluded from his results that one would have performed quite well from 1961-1976 by buying stocks with the lowest values of these three criteria:

  • A low multiple (e.g.,10) of the preceding year’s earnings;
  • A price equal to half the previous market high (“to indicate that there has been considerable shrinkage”);
  • Net Asset Value. (I presume this is the lowest price relative to book value)

In his next interview published in Medical Economics, September 20, 1976 titled “The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks” Graham, then 82, proposed a simpler, more refined formula that consisted of:

  • PE Ratio of 7x-10x or less (Based on 2x current AAA bond rates)*;
  • [Equity/Asset Ratio of .5 or more (e.g. Debt/Equity <1)].
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MisterWong
  • NewsVine
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tipd
More on this topic (What's this?)
Ben Graham ~ Quote of the Week
5 Facts About Benjamin Graham
Read more on Benjamin Graham at Wikinvest

Related posts:

  1. A Week of Reading. Zweig, Graham, Beinhocker and Grantham
  2. A Journey Through Security Analysis
  3. M2 Telecommunications Delivers Strong Growth and Forecast
  4. Intel Corporation (INTC)

5 Comments »

  • Nic said:

    Good article Dean! Debt/Equity>1 looks odd. “Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more” implied it should be the other way around: Equity/Debt>1 instead.

  • Dean Morel (author) said:

    Hi Nic, thanks for the comment.
    I clearly didn’t proof my article or the linked passaged from Gurufocus very well, thanks for catching that.
    The Equity/Asset ratio or Asset/Equity ratio as I’m more familiar seeing it expressed is total assets/divided by shareholder equity. So the first part, Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more, implies shareholder equity of at least half of assets. Which means debt must be less than half of assets and equity must be at least equal to debt. So you’re totally right, but as I’m more used to debt/equity I change it to <1. Thanks again and sorry for the ramble, I was thinking out loud.

  • Dean Morel (author) said:

    Here’s a follow-up comment kelbon made on the same TMF thread.
    Here’s a quick “rule of thumb” on the subject of growth stocks, from The Intelligent Investor

    Most of the writing of security analysts on formal appraisals relates to the valuation of growth stocks. Our study of the various methods has led us to suggest a foreshortened and quite simple formula for the valuation of growth stocks, which is intended to produce figures fairly close to those resulting from the more refined mathematical calculations. Our formula is:

    Value = Current (Normal) Earnings x (8.5 plus twice the expected annual growth rate)

  • Dean Morel (author) said:

    and another from Kelbon, sheesh I’m going to have to order The Intelligent Investor now.
    The check-list from Chapter 14 of The Intelligent Investor

    Stock Selection for the Defensive Investor

    1. Adequate Size of the Enterprise
    All our minimum figures must be arbitrary and especially in the matter of size required. Our idea is to exclude small companies which may be subject to more than average vicissitudes especially in the industrial field…

    2. A Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition
    For industrial companies current assets should be at least twice current liabilities—a so-called two-to-one current ratio. Also, long-term debt should not exceed the net current assets (or “working capital”). For public utilities the debt should not exceed twice the stock equity (at book value).

    3. Earnings Stability
    Some earnings for the common stock in each of the past ten years.

    4. Dividend Record
    Uninterrupted payments for at least the past 20 years.

    5. Earnings Growth
    A minimum increase of at least one-third in per-share earnings in the past ten years using three-year averages at the beginning and end.

    6. Moderate Price/Earnings Ratio
    Current price should not be more than 15 times average earnings of the past three yeas.

    7. Moderate Ratio of Price to Assets.
    Current price should not be more than 1 1/2 times the book value last reported. However, a multiplier of earnings below 15 could justify a correspondingly higher multiplier of assets. As a rule off thumb we suggest that the product of the multiplier times the ratio of price to book value should not exceed 22.5 (This figure corresponds to 15 times earnings and 1 1/2 book value. It would admit an issue selling at only 9 times earnings and 2.5 times asset value, etc.)

  • John said:

    You should have included increasing and/or consistent divivends over a 5 year period. Technical Analysis should be imported because it dot not exist in its modern sense at the time of the writing. If certain bearish indicators are set off an investor may be wise to wait. Somtimes TA indicators precede an earnings diasspointment or pricing correction. I like to include some growth stocks with low PE ratios as well, but their histories of earnings are not long enough. I look to Micro Cap Reports for those.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.