Home » Commentary

You Can Want All You Want

December 10, 2009 11:09 am by Dean Morel

But it ain’t gonna do you no good. No matter how much you want the market to do something it is not going to do you any good.

cambridge-us-war-memorialI took today’s photo of the Cambridge US War Memorial. It’s a special place in the world you probably haven’t been. I’m sure there are larger and more impressive memorials, but this one will always be special to me as on the memorial wall we found the name for our son. No, not our actual son, just the name we decided to call our son. My son aside, the memorial is definitely on my top ten places to go in Cambridge.

The Orchard for scones and tea on a summers day also makes my top ten, as does a walk past the main colleges. A punt on the Cam is always good, if you want to do it yourself  make sure you watch how it is done before you give it a go.

Getting back on topic. If you’re wanting something to happen in a market and everything you’re looking at is telling you it should happen and it still ain’t happening then maybe, just maybe you need to look further and understand how and more importantly when others are seeing things happen. Are your time frames right?

Your charts tell you the market is overbought, the fundamentals tell you it is over bought and you never really believed in the rally anyway. So why doesn’t the market capitulate?

Ten Reasons why the market won’t capitulate

  1. Trends go longer than most imagine. You know that, but for some reason you often choose to ignore it.
  2. Earnings are good and going to get better in the year ahead. What do markets do when earnings are improving?
  3. Companies are playing guide and beat better than ever before. Markets go up based on reality beating expectations.
  4. Cash stinks.
  5. Residential property stinks.
  6. Commercial property still has Damocles’ Sword  hanging above it.
  7. So where are you gonna go? Gold? While bubbles are de rigeur in markets, not every move has to result in a bubble, most don’t.
  8. Because way too many people are waiting for it to capitulate. Yes, they’re not as vocal as they were, but they’re out there under invested and under performing.
  9. Because not enough cash has been sucked in the market and too much is on the sidelines.
  10. Because I want it to.

I wrote the above on 4 December and forgot about it until I read 10 REASONS THE EQUITY RALLY IS OVER at The Pragmatic Capitalist.  The 10 reasons belonged to David Rosenberg and TPC concluded with these bullish comments, “In other words, we remain in a “beat and raise” world.  That is unchanged for now and will ultimately be the reason why David’s 10 reasons are wrong and why the unwavering bear will be wrong again about this market top“.

My portfolios are positioned with the following thoughts in mind.

  • The market will be lower at some point in the future, but that could be 12-24 months away.
  • While markets are slightly overvalued the trend is my friend.
  • I may be wrong so I want to positioned so I’m happy whether the market goes up or down. I achieve that by having cash available in the event of a decline, with a solid core of stocks like Telstra and Pfizer that have a chance at outperforming the market and a smattering of stocks that should thrash the market if global economies continue to improve.

Long term readers may have noted by basic philosophy. I buy stocks when markets are likely to be higher in a year or so and I sell stocks when markets are likely to lower in a year or so. I’m a tight-arse and like to buy things when they’re cheap, most of all I like to buy stocks when they are cheap and the overall market is cheap. As always, no matter what the market is doing I’m looking to exchange fairly/overvalued stocks with undervalued stocks which have better risk/reward profiles and catalysts to attract new buyers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MisterWong
  • NewsVine
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tipd

No related posts.

2 Comments »

  • Greg said:

    Dear Dean – I always enjoy your supurbly presented site.

    Couldn’t agree more with the obove article. I am also in TLS (nice dividends – probably some continued out performance) and some nice utilities (have done well with SKI and DUE and hope to do well with PIH now). Then have added a smattering of growth stocks which will allow me to catch some more uptrend if it emerges.

    The thing interesting me the most (as up to now a new value investor, unfamiliar with technicals) – is the work of the Chartist (Nick Radge). Seems that with his Long Term Traders growth portfolio:

    http://www.thechartist.com.au/membership-packages/long-term-traders.html

    he can get a pretty effortless 25% pa (that is without dividends and inclusive of trading costs) – and with the luxury of automatically going to cash when the market gets scary again… Am hoping to subscribe in the new year.

    My next challenge is CFDs if the market trends down. Have no idea about this but my ‘Bluesky’ report is aparently going to take us through these step by step.

    I only mention this as I noticed your portfolio actually went UP when the market went down last year, and I am sure this was not through normal equities!

    Wishing you all the best with your trading and fathering,

    From Japan,
    Greg Seymour

  • Dean Morel (author) said:

    Hi Greg
    Thanks a lot for you kind words, I appreciate them.
    I downloaded the performance of the Chartist. First up there is no such thing as an effortless 25% pa return. Super-investor’s returns are in the low 20%.

    Here are the notes from the performance table.
    Notes:

    • Past results are not indicative of future performance. [But we'll show you these simulated results anyway hoping they'll suck you in.]
    • Data from Jan 2009 in BLUE representative of Nick Radge real time Growth Portfolio results. Results prior not indicative of this portfolio. [So only 2009 is real performance, which was virtually flat with the market.]
    • Data in this table prior 2009 based on simulations. [Data mining can produce scores of simulated results with outstanding prior performance, anyway trying to sell a service based on them is not someone I would trust.]
    • Subscriber positions, portfolio’s and returns may differ. [May? You gotta be joking. Will differ! Subscribers never get the same returns for scores of reasons.]

    Greg, I’ve learnt a lot from subscribing to newsletter over the last fifteen years or so. If you consider them an educational expense then you’ll get some value, but I wouldn’t start dreaming of an effortless 25% pa.

    Having a quick look around Nick Radge seems to be respected and praised as a good teacher, so that’s positive. Have you bought and read his book? I’d start with that prior to subscribing.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.